<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Against Politics &#187; Voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://againstpolitics.com/category/voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://againstpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Anarchy Naturalized</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:44:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Voting anarchists</title>
		<link>http://againstpolitics.com/2011/12/13/voting-anarchists/</link>
		<comments>http://againstpolitics.com/2011/12/13/voting-anarchists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collective Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patri Friedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stefan Molyneux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunni Maravillosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy McElroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://againstpolitics.com/?p=3863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the longest ongoing debates in anarchism concerns the morality of voting. Thomas Woods has weighed in and not only believes that it is not immoral to vote, but that there are good reasons to vote for a candidate such as Ron Paul. He writes: If you were stuck in a prison camp, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://againstpolitics.com/2011/12/13/voting-anarchists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darwinian Politics</title>
		<link>http://againstpolitics.com/2011/07/06/darwinian-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://againstpolitics.com/2011/07/06/darwinian-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affirmative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Game Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerd Gigerenzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul H. Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prisoner's Dilemma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Social Science Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilitarianism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=3614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul H. Rubin&#8217;s Darwinian Politics: The Evolutionary Origin of Freedom is a fine introduction to the sociobiology of politics. Rubin is a self-identified libertarian but he makes a serious attempt to avoid dogmatism and consider evidence that points in the opposite direction. For example, on the issue of personal freedom his research forced him to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://againstpolitics.com/2011/07/06/darwinian-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is politics neutral?</title>
		<link>http://againstpolitics.com/2010/11/01/is-politics-neutral/</link>
		<comments>http://againstpolitics.com/2010/11/01/is-politics-neutral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depoliticization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randall Holcombe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strict Liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One assumption that has greatly contributed to the growth of government is the belief that the practice of politics as such is ideologically neutral. Nothing could be further from the truth. At the most abstract level politics concerns the making of non-unanimous collective decisions. To endorse and participate in this practice undermines a strict interpretation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://againstpolitics.com/2010/11/01/is-politics-neutral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond politics</title>
		<link>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/beyond-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/beyond-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony de Jasay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epicurus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Evola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Strauss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Hedonism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Hobbes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/blog/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the introduction to his collection of writings, Socratic Puzzles, Robert Nozick writes that  he never responded to the sizable literature on Anarchy, State and Utopia. His natural inclination would be to defend his views. As Nozick notes, “How could I learn that my views were mistaken if I thought about them always with defensive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/beyond-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The addiction to politics</title>
		<link>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/the-addiction-to-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/the-addiction-to-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony de Jasay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/blog/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can politics become an addiction? A more realistic question is to ask why politics is an addiction for so many people. The most straightforward answer would be that a compulsive interest in politics just reflects a natural preoccupation with advancing one’s interest (or that of others). But as was discussed in the previous installment, The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/the-addiction-to-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The calculus of voting</title>
		<link>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/the-calculus-of-voting/</link>
		<comments>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/the-calculus-of-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rational Ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rationality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/blog/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it rational to vote? For most people the question may seem absurd but quite a few economists and political scientists have made the claim that it is not. The reasoning is that in large elections the probability that your individual vote will decide the outcome is so small that voting is a futile exercise. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://againstpolitics.com/2008/12/01/the-calculus-of-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

